The bokeh on the f/2.8 is obviously much better however the f/4 lens’ bokeh is also quite nice. Keep in mind that focal length factors into how the bokeh looks as well. Longer focal lengths make
If you can live with f4 lens, the Canon 70-200 f4 IS is not far behind from the Canon's best and costs about the same as the Tamron. Macro guy's gear list: Macro guy's gear list Canon EOS 5D Mark II Canon EF 50mm F1.8 II Canon EF 70-200mm F4L IS USM +4 more
The f/2.8 lens shows a bit of softness at f/2.8, which improves upon stopping down, until it is sharp at f/8. The f/4 version, however, is fairly soft at all aperture settings, with mild improvement at f/8.
F2.8: F4.5: Dubcat wrote: hi - i'm new to photography and about to buy my frist slr. I am stuck between the Sigma 70-200 2.8 vs Canon 70-200 f4 L lenses, as are many others. One problem I have is that due to my inexperience I am finding it hard to work out whether I need the faster lens or not. Is there a BIG difference between the dimmest light Performance top. The Tamron 70-200/2.8 G2 is an excellent performer. It's the same size and weight of the real Canon or Nikon lenses and works just as well — but only costs half as much! It's super-sharp, has great bokeh, has fast, quiet autofocus and has great image stabilization.
Review: comparison Canon 135mm f/2L vs. Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II One lens that has a huge loyal fanbase, is the Canon 135mm f/2L USM lens (B&H / Amazon). It has a wide aperture for a medium telephoto lens, and the lens is small and compact. Unassuming. Easy to love. Then the inevitable question comes up from photographers stepping Read more inside
Even if you don't care about hitting f/2.8, the Sigma and Tamron f/2.8 lenses are simply better (though only slightly) than the Canon f/4s; for the people who are looking at the Canon f/4 as a way to save money, the Tamron 70-210 saves you even more for the same performance with a better warranty.
The Pentax FA* 80-200mm F2.8. Let's not forget Pentax's previous fast full-frame zoom. This film-era autofocus lens was produced from 1994 to 2004 ( view specifications in our database) but still commands fairly high prices second-hand. We compared this lens to the D FA* 70-200mm and immediately observed that superiority of the newer optical
has a silent focus motor built into the lens. Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM. Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM. Lenses with built-in focus motor focus faster and more quietly than lenses without a focus motor which rely on the camera's body focus motor. minimum focus distance.
Switched from Canon 5D series to Sony a7 series but kept my Canon 70-200 f/4 IS. Even with a Metabones IV adapter, I got a lot of out-of-focus shots of a rapidly moving small child. Sold the Canon and bought the Sony f/4 70-200 and eliminated the problem. I can't say which lens is shaper -- it's hard to compare zooms.
yakim_peled1. When both are in f/4, there is no difference but if you compare wide open shots then the f/2.8 has a considerable edge. For portraits the rule is simple: The faster the better. Thus, the 70-200/2.8 will be better than 70-200/4 IS and the 85/1.8 and 135/2 will be considerably better than both of them.

p.1 #5 · p.1 #5 · Canon 70-200 f/4 vs. 2.8 IS bokeh. 85 1.8 is a very good lens for portraiture and bokeh out of that is awesome. Now regarding 2.8 v 4 IS. 2.8 Has more blur (not neccessarily better) than 4. But with good choice of background and focal length you can get very nice bokeh from 4IS.

The Canon 70-200 f4 is lens offers image stabilization while the non-is lens does not. This feature allows for better handheld shooting and sharper images. The Canon 70-200mm lens series is known for its excellent zoom range and sharpness. The decision between the is and non-is version comes down to your shooting style and needs.
The Canon RF 70-200mm F4L IS USM is the world’s shortest and lightest interchangeable 70-200mm f/4 lens. It has a collapsible design and although when it’s extended it’s almost identical in length to the EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II USM, when it’s collapsed its just 11.9cm long so it will fit in the space normally occupied by a standard f/4 zoom lens.
\n \n \n canon 70 200 f4 vs f2 8

The Tamron 70-200 VC has noticeably better image quality than the Sigma 70-200 OS at f/2.8. The differences are less noticeable at f/4, but the Tamron remains the image quality leader except at 200mm where the Sigma performs better in the corners. You buy a 70-200 f/2.8 to use at f/2.8. Otherwise, buy a Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM Lens. It

hitting the streets (at least in Chicago). So here is where input is. required: the Canon 70-200L f2.8 is selling for less than the L f/4 IS. (approximately $100.00). In my case, I would be using the lens in a varity of. situations as a walk around lens for general daylight use and inside at small.

lens mount. Canon EF. Canon EF. weather-sealed (splashproof) Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II USM. Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2. The device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures caused by dust, raindrops, and water splashes. Has a metal mount. Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II USM.
Maybe a very slight edge to the 2.8 stopped to f4 compared to the f4 at f/4, mainly on the wide end (70mm). Most viewers are never going to notice a difference. Points in favor of the f2.8: Obviously it's a full stop brighter than the f/4, which means better subject/background separation and bokeh.
Options. 02-13-2017 01:34 AM. Any of Canon's 70-200mm lenses can blow the socks of off a standard 75-300 camera kit lens. Canon makes 4 versions of the lens, and all are constant aperture lenses, f/4 and f/2.8. There are versions at each aperture with and without IS. The versions with IS are weather sealed, while the non-IS versions are not. .